Acts - 28:5



5 However he shook off the creature into the fire, and wasn't harmed.

Verse In-Depth

Explanation and meaning of Acts 28:5.

Differing Translations

Compare verses for better understanding.
And he shook off the beast into the fire, and felt no harm.
Howbeit he shook off the creature into the fire, and took no harm.
And he indeed shaking off the beast into the fire, suffered no harm.
He however, having shaken off the beast into the fire, felt no harm.
And he shook off the animal into the fire, and felt no harm.
he then, indeed, having shaken off the beast into the fire, suffered no evil,
He, however, shook the reptile off into the fire and was unhurt.
But shaking off the beast into the fire, he got no damage.
But shaking off the creature into the fire, he indeed suffered no ill effects.
However, Paul shook the creature off into the fire and took no harm.

*Minor differences ignored. Grouped by changes, with first version listed as example.


Historical Commentaries

Scholarly Analysis and Interpretation.

Shaking off the viper. The shaking off of the viper is a token of a quiet mind. For we see how greatly fear doth trouble and weaken men; and yet you must not think that Paul was altogether void of fear. For faith doth not make us blockish, as brain-sick men do imagine, when they be out of danger. [1] But though faith doth not quite take away the feeling of evils, yet it doth temperate the same, lest the godly be more afraid than is meet; that they may always be bold and have a good hope. So though Paul understand that the viper was a noisome beast, yet did he trust to the promise which was made to him, and did not so fear her plaguy [2] biting, that it did trouble him; because he was even ready to die if need had been.

Footnotes

1 - "In umbra et extra teli jacturam," in the shade, and out of bowshot.

2 - "Pestiferum," pestiferous, deadly.

And he shook off - In this was remarkably fulfilled the promise of the Saviour Mark 16:18; "They shall take up serpents," etc.

Shook off the beast into the fire, and felt no harm - This is a presumptive evidence that the viper did not bite St. Paul: it fastened on his hand, but had no power to injure him.

And he shook off the beast into the fire,.... Having held it a while, and as being master of it, and as not being afraid of it, though it was the ready way to provoke it to fasten on him again:
and felt no harm; it having not bit him, nor infected him with its poison; and hereby was fulfilled what our Lord promised to his disciples, Mark 16:18;

shook off the beast and felt no harm--See Mark 16:18.

Having shaken off the venomous animal, he suffered no harm - The words of an eminent modern historian are, "No venomous kind of serpent now breeds in Malta, neither hurts if it be brought thither from another place. Children are seen there handling and playing even with scorpions; I have seen one eating them." If this be so, it seems to be fixed by the wisdom of God, as an eternal memorial of what he once wrought there.

*More commentary available at chapter level.


Discussion on Acts 28:5

User discussion of the verse.






*By clicking Submit, you agree to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use.