Joshua - 15:57



57 Kain, Gibeah, and Timnah; ten cities with their villages.

Verse In-Depth

Explanation and meaning of Joshua 15:57.

Differing Translations

Compare verses for better understanding.
Cain, Gibeah, and Timnah; ten cities with their villages:
Accain, Gabaa and Thamna: ten cities and their villages.
Kain, Gibeah and Timnah: ten cities and their hamlets.
Kain, Gibeah, and Timnah; ten towns with their unwalled places.
Cain, Giba, et Thimna: urbes decem, et villae earum.

*Minor differences ignored. Grouped by changes, with first version listed as example.


Historical Commentaries

Scholarly Analysis and Interpretation.

Timnah - A frontier town of the Philistines; it was in this place that Samson got his wife, see Judges 14:1-15:20.

Cain,.... Cain, or Hakain, "that Cain", we nowhere else read of; whether the name was given it by the old Canaanites, in memory of Cain, the son of Adam, is not certain:
Gibeah; there were other places that went by the name of Gibeah; there was a Gibeah in Benjamin, Judges 20:4, and another in the same tribe called Gibeah of Saul, 1-Samuel 11:4, to distinguish it from that; but this was in the tribe of Judah. Masius conjectures it is the same with that in 1-Samuel 23:19 which was near Ziph; and not amiss. Jerom (u) makes mention of Gabaha and Gabatha, little villages to the east of Daroma; and of another Gabatha, near Bethlehem, in the tribe of Judah; but whether either of these are meant it is doubtful:
Timnah, of this city; see Gill on Joshua 15:10,
ten cities with their villages; the number agrees with the names of them.
(u) Ut supra, (De loc. Hebrews.) fol. 92. C.

Cain (Hakkain) is possibly the same as Jukin, on the south-east of Hebron (Rob. ii. p. 449). Gibeah cannot be the Gabatha near Bethlehem, mentioned in the Onom. (s. v. Gabathaon), or the Gibea mentioned by Robinson (ii. p. 327), i.e., the village of Jeba, on a hill in the Wady el Musurr, as this does not come within the limits of the present group; it must rather be one of the two places (Gebaa and Gebatha) described as viculi contra orientalem plagam Daromae, though their situation has not yet been discovered. Timnah, probably the place already mentioned in Genesis 38:12., has not been discovered.

*More commentary available at chapter level.


Discussion on Joshua 15:57

User discussion of the verse.






*By clicking Submit, you agree to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use.