And they that sat at meat with him began to say within themselves, Who is this that forgiveth sins also?

And they that sat at meat with him began to say within themselves, Who is this that even forgiveth sins?

And they that were with them at table began to say within themselves, Who is this who forgives also sins?

and those reclining with him (at meat) began to say within themselves, 'Who is this, who also doth forgive sins?'

And they that sat at meat with him began to say within themselves, Who is this that forgives sins also?

Then the other guests began to say to themselves, "Who can this man be who even forgives sins?"

And those who were seated at table with him said to themselves, Who is this who even gives forgiveness of sins?

And those who were reclining with him began to say to themselves, 'Who is this who even forgives sins?'

The other guests began to say to one another, "Who is this man who even pardons sins?"

And those who sat at table with him began to say within themselves. Hence we again learn, that ignorance of Christ's office constantly leads men to conceive new grounds of offense. The root of the evil is, that no one examines his own wretched condition, which undoubtedly would arouse every man to seek a remedy. There is no reason to wonder that hypocrites, who slumber amidst their vices, [1] should murmur at it as a thing new and unexpected, when Christ forgives sins.

Footnotes

1 - "Qui se plaisent et fiattent en leurs vices;" -- "who please and flatter themselves amidst their vices."

Who is this - A very pertinent question. Who could he be but God? Man could not do it, and there is no wonder that they were amazed.

And they that sat at meat with him,.... Other Pharisees that sat at Simon's table with Christ, whom he had invited as guests, on this occasion of seeing and conversing with Jesus; or some of Simon's family, that sat down to eat with him;
began to say within themselves; that is, either thought and reasoned in their own minds, or whispered among themselves:
who is this that forgiveth sins also? who not content to transgress the traditions of the elders, by admitting a sinful woman to touch him, but assumes that to himself which is peculiar to God, to forgive sin: this they said, not as wondering at him, what manner of person he must be, that with such authority pronounced the forgiveness of sin, as Grotius thinks; but rather as offended with him, and filled with indignation against him, and so censuring and reproaching him for wickedness and blasphemy.

they that sat . . . Who is this, &c.--No wonder they were startled to hear One who was reclining at the same couch, and partaking of the same hospitalities with themselves, assume the awful prerogative of "even forgiving sins." But so far from receding from this claim, or softening it down, our Lord only repeats it, with two precious additions: one, announcing what was the one secret of the "forgiveness" she had experienced, and which carried "salvation" in its bosom; the other, a glorious dismissal of her in that "peace" which she had already felt, but is now assured she has His full warrant to enjoy! This wonderful scene teaches two very weighty truths: (1) Though there be degrees of guilt, insolvency, or inability to wipe out the dishonor done to God, is common to all sinners. (2) As Christ is the Great Creditor to whom all debt, whether great or small, contracted by sinners is owing, so to Him belongs the prerogative of forgiving it. This latter truth is brought out in the structure and application of the present parable as it is nowhere else. Either then Jesus was a blaspheming deceiver, or He is God manifest in the flesh.