In the resurrection therefore, when they shall rise, whose wife shall she be of them? for the seven had her to wife.

In the resurrection therefore, when they shall rise again, whose wife shall she be of them? for the seven had her to wife.

In the resurrection, when they shall rise again, of which of them shall she be wife, for the seven had her as wife?

in the rising again, then, whenever they may rise, of which of them shall she be wife, for the seven had her as wife?'

At the Resurrection whose wife will she be? For they all seven married her."

In the future life, when they come back from the dead, whose wife will she be? for the seven had her for a wife.

At the resurrection whose wife will she be, all seven brothers having had her as their wife?"

When they shall rise - This clause is wanting in BCDL, four others, Syriac, later Arabic, later Persic, Coptic, Saxon, and two of the Itala. Griesbach leaves it doubtful.

In the resurrection therefore, when they shall rise,.... This last clause, "when they shall rise", is omitted in two copies of Beza's, and in the Syriac, Arabic, Persic, and Ethiopic versions, because, perhaps, it might be thought superfluous; but this is agreeably to the way of speaking and writing with the Jews: so in the Targum on Zac 3:7, , "in the quickening of the dead I will quicken thee"; or, in the resurrection of the dead I will raise thee. The question put on supposition of a resurrection, and that these seven brethren, and the wife they all had should rise, then is,
whose wife shall she be of them? of the seven brethren;
for the seven had her to wife. She was, according to law, the lawful wife of all seven; what particular and special claim could one have to her above the rest? See Gill on Matthew 22:28.

In the resurrection therefore when they shall rise, &c.