And if a kingdom has become divided against itself, that kingdom cannot subsist.

and if a kingdom against itself be divided, that kingdom cannot be made to stand;

For if civil war breaks out in a kingdom, nothing can make that kingdom last;

If there is division in a kingdom, that kingdom will come to destruction;

For if a kingdom is divided against itself, that kingdom is not able to stand.

When a kingdom is divided against itself, it cannot last;

But when the Pharisees heard it. The scribes cannot withhold the acknowledgment of a fact so open and manifest, and yet they maliciously carp [1] at what Christ did by Divine power. Not only do they obscure the praise of the miracle, but endeavor to turn it into a reproach, as if it were performed by magical enchantment; and that work, which could not be ascribed to a man, is alleged by them to have the devil for its author. Of the word Beelzebub I have spoken under the Tenth Chapter, [2] and of the prince of the devils I have said a little under the Ninth Chapter. [3] The opinion expressed by the scribes, that there is a prince among wicked spirits, did not arise from a mistake of the common people, or from supposition, but from a conviction entertained among the godly, that the reprobate have a head, in the same manner as Christ is the Head of the Church.

Footnotes

1 - "Ils ne laissent pas toutesfois de ronger, comme par despit et d'un vouloir malicieux;" -- "and yet they do not fail to carp as with spite, and with a wicked disposition."

2 - Harmony, volume 1. [9]p. 459.

3 - Harmony, volume 1: [10]p. 419. The reader must have observed that, when our Author has explained a phrase or illustrated a fact, he seldom repeats what he had said, but refers to the earlier portions of his work, in which the information may be found. It is not improbable that this may have been his leading motive for adopting the plan of a Harmony, instead of writing a separate Commentary on each Gospel. He had made some observations on Matthew 9:34, But the Pharisees said, He casteth out devils by the prince of the devils; and takes for granted, that the terms which occur in that passage require no farther elucidation. But it would appear to have escaped his recollection that, on the occasion alluded to, he satisfied himself with general remarks on the "wicked slander" of the Pharisees, and took no notice of the phrase, prince of the devils. The deficiency is partly supplied by an explanation which he now makes. -- Ed.

And if a kingdom be divided against itself,.... Any of the kingdoms of this world, and the kingdom of "Satan":
that kingdom cannot stand: not long; its internal broils and divisions will, soon bring it to desolation; See Gill on Matthew 12:25.